108 Vadym Rozhko, Volodymyr Streltsov
– improving the organization, forms and methods of information support for
the military-political activities of the state;
– optimization of interaction between the state’s security forces and the media on
military-political issues;
– improvement of regulatory and legal mechanisms regulating information rela-
tions in the eld of military policy of the state.2
Let us look at these areas in more detail. In modern conditions, humanity as
a whole is experiencing a turning point associated with an avalanche-like increase in
the amount of information ow and the volume of information. It is no coincidence
that experts started talking about problems associated with the information barrier,
which can only be overcome with a qualitative change in the mechanism of infor-
mation processing itself. There are objective and subjective information barriers.
The rst, for example, include spatial, temporal, technological, historical, political,
terminological and other barriers. The latter, as a rule, include mainly psychologi-
cal barriers. Therefore, one of the most important tasks of any information system is
the timely overcoming of information barriers, that is, negative factors aecting
the processes of collection, distribution, perception and consumption of information.3
It is obvious that widespread informatisation in the military sphere helps to over-
come information barriers and signicantly improves the eectiveness of the military-
political activities of the state.
Solving the problems of information support for the military-political activities of
the state in a timely manner and also with a quality high enough to satisfy the informa-
tion needs of the decision makers of military policy in modern conditions naturally
requires the accelerated development of the process of informatisation of the military
sphere of society.4
Today, our society has abandoned simplied views and approaches to informa-
tisation only as extensive computerization has provided the population with wide
accessed to information. It has now become generally accepted that this is not just
the introduction of computer technology into various areas of socio-economic practice,
but the formation of integral automated technologies and their mass “incorporation”
into societaluse whichhas lead to basic models of activity. The experience of de-
veloped countries that have entered the post-industrial stage of development shows
that informatisation necessarily includes the following interrelated processes:
2 Horbyk, R., The war phone: mobile communication on the frontline in Eastern Ukraine, Digi War
2002, 3, pp. 9–24; Martin, A., Digital literacy..., op. cit., pp. 151–176.
3 Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J. & Clark, R.E. Why Minimally Guided Teaching Techniques Do
Not Work: A Reply to Commentaries,”Educational Psychologist” 2007, 42(2), pp. 115–121;
Trantopoulos, K., Krogh, G. von, Wallin, M., Woerter, W. & M., External knowledge and infor-
mation technology: Implications for process innovation performance, MIS Quarterly 2017, 41(1),
pp. 287–300.
4 Mann, R., Beyond the military sphere, “Media History” 2003, p. 19; Westerman, G. & Bonnet, D.,
Revamping your business through digital transformation, MIT Sloan Management Review 2015,
56(3), pp. 2–5.